Limit Fossil Fuels in New Jericho Buildings

Reducing our co2 emissions in new buildings will save money and bring us closer to our climate goals

Every year the effects of climate change have come closer to home - we've seen the flooding, droughts, lost crops, and pests.

Homes contribute 36% of Vermont’s CO2 emissions. The best way to retrofit a home is to build it right the first time.

Heat Pump technology is here, affordable, and proven. Let’s decide to use it in Jericho

The outdoor condenser of a heat pump

What does it mean to limit fossil fuel usage?

Variants of ordinance for new construction homes has popped up in more than 110 towns accross the U.S.. Burlington and South Burlington have lead the way in Vermont, passing laws which strike a balance of encouraging clean homes while allowing backup options.

Map showing fossil fuel limitations in cities

Rather than prohibiting fossil fuels completely, buildings are required to use a primary heating source for air and water which uses renewable energy. Practically speaking, this means heat pumps for the immediate future. Gas stoves are not affected.

Heat Pumps have matured incredibly quickly over recent years. Today’s models, which can put out heat at full power at -13°F, are dramatically cheaper and more cold-weather capable than those from just five or ten years ago.

To help homeowners make sense of new technology, and be savvy shoppers, we have put together a Buyers Guide for Cold-Climate Heat Pumps.

What is the petition for?

With 250 signatures (5% of Jericho voters), and with approval from the Selectboard, this petition will add a new item for discussion in the Warned Agenda in Jericho’s 2024 town meeting. If approved by residents at that point, the town will be required to pass ordinance similar to Burlington and South Burlington.

This will discourage fossil fuel usage for air and water in new homes only, but not prevent it completely. You can read the exact ordinance as passed last year in South Burlington.

Why does this matter?

Vermont has ambitous climate goals, which we are unfortunately falling well short of. Over the course of the coming decades, many existing buildings will need to be converted from fossil-fuel based heating to renewable, at great expense to the state, town, and homeowners.

It is far cheaper to build new buildings the right way at the beginning than to have the homeowner stuck updating to prevent pollution.

What will it cost the town?

Nothing. The existing permitting process will be amended. Enforcement

What will this cost to homeowners?

Operation

Much research has been done on the operating costs of today’s heat pumps versus oil, propane, and natural gas.

Installation

Modern code requires well-insulated homes, thereby minimizing spending required for heat pumps. Many builders opt to go all-electric as significant cost-savings can be had by not installing gas lines, additional venting, and the like.

Rocky Mountain Institute made a study of costs for all-electric homes versus fossil-fueled ones:

Costs of all-electric vs fossil fuel homes.
Fully electric homes cost less up-front, and less to operate, leaving savings for backup or other uses.

Back it up

Even with modern cold-climate heat pumps, new homes will often be better with backup heat — be that oil, gas, or something else. With that, initial costs can go back up slightly, in return for the additional reliability in the case of grid outage.

Woodstove

Woodstove A woodstove works,
grid or no.

Generator

Woodstove A propane generator can make electricity for the whole house.

Natural Gas

Hybrid Gas+Heat Pump systems can automaticaly switch to natural gas as temperatures drop.

Multi-Unit Dwellings - A Case Study

We talked to Elm Place retirement homes, in Milton VT. They recently completed two 30-unit facilities — one with fossil fuels, and one all-electric. They found that the second cost about 2% in higher costs up-front, but paid for itself within two (!) years.

The outdoor condenser of a heat pump

But Wait, there’s More

Who’s Behind This?